KIPP’s trademark conceitedness used to be obviously on show in California ultimate week, the place the KIPP Foundation’s newest efforts to open some other highschool in San Jose had been rejected through the Santa Clara County Board of Education.
Why? Because the KIPP Foundation refuses to abide through state regulation, which contains required adherence to California Code 1090, which might ban KIPP managers from gaining financially from contracts made through those self same KIPP managers:
of the Legislature, state, county, district, judicial district, and
town officials or workers shall now not be financially all for any
contract made through them of their professional capability, or through any frame or
board of which they’re individuals. Nor shall state, county, district,
judicial district, and town officials or workers be shoppers at any
sale or distributors at any acquire made through them of their professional capability.
particular person shall now not support or abet a Member of the Legislature or a
state, county, district, judicial district, or town officer or worker
in violating subdivision (a).
used on this
article, “district” manner any company of the state shaped pursuant
to basic regulation or particular act, for the native efficiency of governmental
or proprietary purposes inside restricted limitations.
(Amended through Stats. 2014, Ch. 483, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2015.)
Again, such conceitedness could be fun if it didn’t have the prospective to normalize the rejection of constraints at the company use of public bucks. KIPP is interesting to the California State Board of Education.